TreeFitty

I put together a bunch of good ones (videos) here: Awesome Mods for GTA IV on PC

So people cry about it.

Shouldn't matter how you download it. Your internet speed is still the same.

I have the trailer saved on my computer.

I can't see the dog running. Any chance you could make an animated gif so I can see what you're seeing? Not actually running but you can see it off to the right of the cops running:

dirty stealer!

/added above

^I madez a vector graphic of the bugstar logo Kind of plain. Postal has a red symbol but you can only see a little corner of it on the back of the truck in the trailer. ^another vector graphic for the logo. I blame OPx.

This topic (and the one merged into this) isn't about the R3 side missions such as the taxi. This is about the side missions involving people you meet a few times during the game. Eddie Low and Badman in GTA IV are examples.

If you have nothing constructive to add, then don't post.

/merged

Beta released.

Awesome. Welcome to the forums!

Merging and locking topics in GTA5 because there are threads that are related for example. On to your next point: The whole point of merging topics is so that good topics don't fall to the second page to make room for four simular topics So you want multiple topics about the same thing (pointless) but don't want the "good" topics (typically the first one the others get merged into) to fall down the page? Sense: this makes not. People don't like when you lock their topics, and as active as this place is, it's not really needed. You should consider getting rid of all the staff, or at least stopping them from making rediculous changes and locking topics / banning members "because they are annoying" ... I can't believe a moderator would post a topic in the asylum called "Elitism", asking members if they should ban new members because they are annoying. But they did it. You know better than me, but i CANT believe that is good for the site, or for you personally. Very few times I've seen a lock as overkill. As for the Elitism topic, it was in regards to the complete tards (such as those who "work for Rockstar" if you don't recall). Stop exaggerating. Secondly, on the signatures... thought it was my computer fucking the signature up, turns it was Duffman. I can see the need to control signature limits, but we didn't seem to have a problem with it before when there was 150 members online at anygiven time, and bandwith was an issue, so what has changed between now and then. I wanted to have a discussion about it, or to atleast hear your response... but Duffman locks the topic because it annoys him... I wasn't looking for duffman's respnse, because he doesn't own the site. He didn't seem to understand that. Duffmann complains that he made the change becuase it's hard for him to tell the signature is over the 250px limit (for the image). If it's so close to the right size that you have to open up photoshop to make sure it ain't 251 pixels, then you need to find something else to do. Let it be. I can easily tell the difference between 250 pixel, and 350, for example. We've never had a limit on text in a signature, since the main concern was bandwith. If your going to place a limit on it, at least make it reasonable. 250 for image and text is too small. It's not completely a bandwidth issue. Scrolling past a tall image is just as annoying as a tall signature overall. I like the new enforcement. In response to your "if people post stupid topics" options, typically the topic turns into a flame fest of calling the OP a tard. For your complaints overall, you yourself have posted tard topics in almost a trolling manner. I laughed when you reported spam about a week and a half ago.

You poor thing.

I'm sure they think they can get things done ahead of time by assuming not much changes from IV to V. But if the IV mod "failed", why would they bother with V? Seems kind of dumb.

Go for it. You'll probably have something before I do. Question for Psy: Is it possible to rotate multiple images? Or was getting the ads to work in the first place too much?

I'm thinking GTA adverts like Sprunk and such. So either way you see ads, just depends if they are real or GTA.

It's kind of like a sig size enforcement. I say leave it be.

Considering the space it takes up, maybe there is an actual size constraint for signatures. (?)

http://www.igta5.com...a-v-antagonist/

I'm not even going to bother watching these stupid videos anymore. The person making them is obviously a tard.

It's the real life 801 Tower per the map I made.

This is the frame in question: BUT WAIT!! I KNOW WHAT IT ACTUALLY IS:

Whoever makes these videos is retarded. The intro and music is stupid, then they claim they see a horse in one frame of a reflection and state there is a can of dog food - which you can't even read or see well since it is so small and blurry. Plus the fact the container is the size of a paint can. And we've known there are animals and pets in the game all because of the first scene of the first trailer. It is obviously a dog, and it is extremely likely it is following the people right in front of it since they don't seem to take notice or care about a big dog sniffing their heels - a pet.