Joe King

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    203

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Joe King

  1. Joe King
    And what else is anything else on these forums? facts? They are just speculations, Wants, that sorta stuff. Go check out more of the forums before stating something like that. Exactly... Every idea/opinion is topic here on this forum. The first person to share the idea starts it as the topic.... As simple a that. the other forums are speculation revolving around real aspects of the series like the map, cops, safehouses, combat etc.. so i can start a forum about whatever random thing i like? i can start a topic titled "will the protagonist be a towel?" and people will take that into serious consideration? XD HAHAHA (i guarantee the topic will be deleted in an instant)
  2. Joe King
    I don't know how to respond to this. It's fucking obvious it needs to be improved from San Andreas, that was complete shit with box-like motion, even worse than IV. IV wasnt much of an improvement. for me it was worse because of the reason i mentioned above. Yeah IV was shit as well in that aspect, but it was definitely better than SA. That's why it's strange to compare it in that context. you could climb sideways while dangling but thats about it for improvement. what that guy was trying to say was not add some ridiculous assassin credd style climbing, just climbing that anyone in good shape can do (like SA/IV) and improve it on a technical scale.
  3. Joe King
    God! I see this statement all the time and it pisses me off that whenever someone suggests a change to the core gameplay ( to possibly make it more varied and fun ), they remind me that GTA is not Saints Row. I flippin' know it's not Saints Row. haha i know man. even when i say they should bring back things from SA, im told to play that fucking saints row game. in GTA III there was a mission where infinatly spawning suicide bombers attack you (you remember the one i mean ), but if i were to suggest something like that for the next game they tell me that belongs in saints row not gta (vintage GTA does not belong in GTA! wtf!) lol
  4. Joe King
    i thought of what i would want. a safehouse similar to smokes crack palace in SA. that would be awesome - a drug factory, bar (add many things to do here) and your safehouse all in one.
  5. Joe King
    climbing was really troublesome in IV. i want to be able to climb onto the ledge of a rooftop rather than automatically jumping over it resulting in a splatery death. I don't know how to respond to this. It's fucking obvious it needs to be improved from San Andreas, that was complete shit with box-like motion, even worse than IV. IV wasnt much of an improvement. for me it was worse because of the reason i mentioned above.
  6. Joe King
    why is this even a topic? its just a random fan wish.
  7. Joe King
    why does this topic have its own forum? not only is it merely a fan-wish but one of the most unlikely things to even exist in GTA. its like if i post a forum about "will the spanish inquisition be in GTA V" (bet ya didnt expect that )
  8. Joe King
    The forum you're referring to is actually called 'The Asylum'. why was i suddenly reminded of that Monty Python sketch "Arguement Clinic"? Report him as a spammer to google... people can post what they want on the internet. not going to be removed just because you dont like it unless you are the site owner or have permission from the site owner. dont visit these articles if you dont like them.
  9. Joe King
    I want to be able to knock people out and then put them in the trunk of a car. Then drive off to a secluded place and murder them, then dump their body in random places. Goodfellas Did you really just say GTA 4 was a step back from GTA 3??? That has to be one of the stupidest comments i've ever heard. is someone wrong just because they dont share your opinion? someone please jesusfacepalm this guy for me
  10. Joe King
    i never said anything stupid. that guy said everything but melee was improved, so i made a list of things other than melee that were downgraded or removed. all was fact. people, this is the shit list forum. the one forum where we can say whatever we want
  11. Joe King
    more serious? right because zombies are totally more realistic than bigfoot and chupacabra XD HAHAHAHA
  12. Joe King
    thats a very good reason why they should be in the game. "largest and most ambitious game Rockstar has yet created" - if its anything less of what SA had, then its not. im only believing what R* have revealed (LS and countryside so far). theres no reason for believing those cities wont be in the game though.
  13. Joe King
    How the hell is it probable? Because you think so? Because from my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) San Francisco and Las Vegas aren't part of Southern California, or the surrounding areas of Los Angeles. How is it probable that they will return? There is no evidence or suggestion whatsoever indicating that they will, so please, enlighten me on why they will return. no offence but after reading your comment i cant get this song out of my head. goes something like: dum dum-dum dum duuuuuum he didnt say they are likely to return, just there is nothing to suggest they wont. you said they probably wont with nothing to back that up with.
  14. Joe King
    ironically that post is the only one in this forum that is not on topic lol
  15. Joe King
    i just hope there is a reward for collecting them. it was fucked up in GTA IV shooting 200 flying rats then having to lose cops after every shot, for no reward other that percentage for completion.
  16. Joe King
    if theres more than 1 city (seems like it judging by the LS size we have seen so far), i hope there are different types of collectables per city plus 1 over type across the entire map just like in San Andreas (LS: tags, SF: snapshots, LV: horseshoes, SA: oysters). perhaps 100 celebrity look alikes spawn in specific locations through LS and you got to kill them to count as collected
  17. Joe King
    i really hope they dont make money a storyline issue. that was a HUGE mistake in GTA IV. by half way through the story i have at least half a million yet Niko is still complaining about how badly he needs cash.
  18. Joe King
    no, vice city you start in a rather nice hotel suite. vcs you start in an army base but quickly move to a run down apartment. san andreas, your first safehouse is a rather nice house. i just hope there is a big variety of them, i want the expensive shit as well as the shitholes like the skmole shack in vc. also want an airstrip like sa
  19. Joe King
    i dont care about those sort of things. for me graphics play a very small part to what makes a game great. those bushes are fine. R* should just concentrate on adding more content.
  20. Joe King
    i want one of them land speed record vehicles. "we came in a rocket car!" lol
  21. Joe King
    there were only 4 helis in gta iv and 3 of them were the same model. nothing compared to what was in SA. in SA you can drive the trains not just ride as passenger. cranes are used for several side missions including lifting cars onto the boat for exporting. they can also be used outside of missions, there are ones to lift cars or there are wrecking balls too. SA had at least 6 times the amount of clothing as in IV. Vice City had a smaller map than IV and had 17 safehouses. IV had only 5 which were: shithole apartment, shithole apartment, shithole apartment, penthouse, penthouse. boring. APC is nothing like the tank in SA, besides we arent talking about TBOGT. cards games and gambling: how does roman get into debt? please remind me about that i will never understand people like you. i will never understand why you people think less content makes a better game so long as graphics are good. also i hate it when you people bring story into it. story is a matter of opinion. for me about 80% of missions in IV were simply "go here, kill this guy (and bodyguards)". so repetative.
  22. Joe King
    i want the melee system to be similar to The Warriors. that was awesome being able to grapple perfectly, drag people around and throw them into cars, through windows, into piles of trash or whatever you want. you were also so many combos you can perform totally depending on buttons you hit in whatever order. this is the kind of brutal fighting that fits GTA.
  23. Joe King
    nothing wrong with that. if youre a hardcore san andreas fan, you had good reason to be pissed off when gta iv came out. i thought iv sucked but yeah i wouldnt post something like this. although i agree with most of it, i would present the points in a reasonable manner. If you thought IV sucked. Just stop playing the GTA'S because you arn't gonna like them from here on out. no, the series can still redeem itself. so long as rockstar stop implementing stupid things like bowling with roman and only make totally awesome things. What do you mean "the series can redeem itself" the series is better then ever. what do you want GTA to become another Saints Row? Im getting tired of you San Andreas fanboys. All SA had was a bigger map and more things to do. GTA IV had better graphics, physics, story, Shooting and COVER SYSTEM. San Andreas was the third game for the last generation of consoles so they had experiance with it. GTA IV was Rockstars first attempt with the next gen consoles besides table tennis. So dont be a tard and use your brain. GTA IV did not suck and if you think it did you are not old enough to play GTA. i guess you werent even born when san andreas came out. prefering a classic over a newer game is not something an antivet would say. every part of gta iv other than graphics was heavily downgraded from san andreas. dont say the series is better than ever. "more things to do" is the biggest understatment ever. im not going to waste forum space as i could make a massive indepth comparrason. you are blinded by IVs graphics. No I am not blinded by IV's graphics. All the gameeplay aspects besides melee combat were greatly improved in IV. San Andreas is a great game. A fantasstic game but for me it's not better then IV and im sure alot of people here will agree with me. everything other than melee? planes, helis, trains (drivable and can be derailed), towing, trucks and trailers (also airport vehicles including mobile stairs), operating cranes to lift things or wrecking balls, bikes, gaining muscle, tattoos, clothes, vehicle customization, 37 safehouses, businesses, tanks, tons of weapons, dual weiding weapons, parachute, thermo goggles, casinos (blackjack, roulette, slots and more), betting shops, gang wars and taking over territory. some of these things were heavily downgraded but most were removed entirely. true IV has things that SA didnt have but nothing too special and nothing to make up flying a huge cargo plane over a military base trying to avoid getting shot down and every other things SA had. all you can do in IV is story missions and go bowling with roman (how fun). hes just talking about how far the new consoles can go. maybe you embedded the wrong video? lol even if he did have a point about IV being better than SA, sam houser is the executive producer right? executive producers have nothing to do with development or any creative process. and besides, the artist doesnt decide if their work is good. its the people that buy into that art who decide.
  24. Joe King
    nothing wrong with that. if youre a hardcore san andreas fan, you had good reason to be pissed off when gta iv came out. i thought iv sucked but yeah i wouldnt post something like this. although i agree with most of it, i would present the points in a reasonable manner. If you thought IV sucked. Just stop playing the GTA'S because you arn't gonna like them from here on out. no, the series can still redeem itself. so long as rockstar stop implementing stupid things like bowling with roman and only make totally awesome things. What do you mean "the series can redeem itself" the series is better then ever. what do you want GTA to become another Saints Row? Im getting tired of you San Andreas fanboys. All SA had was a bigger map and more things to do. GTA IV had better graphics, physics, story, Shooting and COVER SYSTEM. San Andreas was the third game for the last generation of consoles so they had experiance with it. GTA IV was Rockstars first attempt with the next gen consoles besides table tennis. So dont be a tard and use your brain. GTA IV did not suck and if you think it did you are not old enough to play GTA. i guess you werent even born when san andreas came out. prefering a classic over a newer game is not something an antivet would say. every part of gta iv other than graphics was heavily downgraded from san andreas. dont say the series is better than ever. "more things to do" is the biggest understatment ever. im not going to waste forum space as i could make a massive indepth comparrason. you are blinded by IVs graphics.
  25. Joe King
    nothing wrong with that. if youre a hardcore san andreas fan, you had good reason to be pissed off when gta iv came out. i thought iv sucked but yeah i wouldnt post something like this. although i agree with most of it, i would present the points in a reasonable manner. If you thought IV sucked. Just stop playing the GTA'S because you arn't gonna like them from here on out. no, the series can still redeem itself. so long as rockstar stop implementing stupid things like bowling with roman and only make totally awesome things.