Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'car'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Important Information
    • GTAVice.net
    • GTAVice.net Forums
    • Important Information
    • Website & Forum Problems & Discussion
  • General
    • General Discussion
    • Graphics, Media & Entertainment
    • Geek Central
  • Grand Theft Auto 5
    • GTA 5 Pre-Release Discussion (Closed)
    • GTA 5 Post-Release Discussion
    • GTA 5 Mission Discussion
    • GTA Online
  • Other Games
    • Other GTA Games
    • Other Rockstar Games
    • Other Games

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Website URL


AIM


MSN


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests


Twitter


XBL Gamertag


PSN Name


Steam ID


Xfire ID


Social Club

Found 3 results

  1. Hey, can anyone help please, I put a car in my garage and had to take one out as it was full, i have now lost this car ( it was a bought car and modified), can anyone tell me is there a way to get it back? All help appreciated.
  2. Hi, Do you think it would be possible that GTA V includes realistic car crashes, I mean like in the real life. For exemple, during a high speed car crash on the highway, the car would be completely destroyed, not only the bumper. Maybe you think it would make the game too difficult ? So what do you think about an option which could be disabled? I'm not talking about a pc mod, but about an option, natively available on both pc and console. Take a look at it : Especialy at 0:45 and 1:00 It presents the physics engine of Rigs of Rods. Besides the graphic quality, we can see that cars react much like real cars. Think of a physics engine like this in GTA V. .. Do you think it would be possible?
  3. Would you like to have a speedometer in gta5 or not? I hate how you never really know how fast your going and its such an easy thing to implement. That's always bugged me maybe r* will add it this time around?